Daily Archives: August 1, 2012

When to give it up

Sometimes I have a problem. I refuse to give up on something. I will stubbornly refuse to back away from it, and will keep going on at it, despite knowing deep inside that doing so is futile.

In some ways, this is an admirable quality. Tenacity.

In some ways, this is a self-destructive quality. Futility.

Take writing, for example. There inevitably comes that moment when, having had a great idea, a concept so wonderful that it screams to be written down and become the next big thing – bigger than anything that came before. Even better, it’s a labour of love – something you feel so passionate about that you know, you know, that it’s going to be wonderful when you finish it. It’ll be your masterpiece, and everyone will be as in love with it as you are.

And so you set down to write.

The page looks blankly at you. Where, where to begin? Eventually, past all the distractions, you manage a word or two. Then you delete them, because you don’t like them. They’re not the way you want them to be - they don’t reflect you at your best. So you sit and stare at the screen again.
Some time later, you’ve managed to eke out a page or two. And it was torturous. You sweated for every damn letter that came out. Only each one is harder and harder to get out. In your head, it’s so simple – you can see exactly how it should be to be beautiful, to be perfect, to live to its full potential. But stubbornly, it sits there. It refuses to do what you want.
And, oh, it could be so perfect. It could be wonderful. It has so much potential. It just needs to be a little flexible – it needs to reach out to you, to help you. But no! Denied! It sits there, inanimate and uncaring. It does nothing, no matter how much you want it to. And you get frustrated. You get angry. It dominates your day. It’s always on your mind. “If only, if only…”
Like a fool, you go back to it, time and again, trying harder and harder. Each time, you end up more and more frustrated. Each page makes you suffer, and still you keep going, because it’ll all be worth it in the end.

Or will it?

True, history is littered with labours of love. There are a thousand phrases – “nothing good came easy”. But this is you. Or, in this case, me.

The cost to me, and to those around me has to be taken into account. Can I keep pouring myself into something like this, something which stubbornly sits there? Let me give it another analogy. Imagine this book as a relationship.

You love this person. You love them deeply. So much so that you would do anything for them – and you have. Over and again. You’ve sacrificed your vision, your beliefs, your principles, your pride for them. You have done everything for them. Lived for them, breathed for them. You’ve changed your thoughts, your actions, your behaviours for them. You want them to be happy. You have lived only for them.

You spend your money on them. You take them out, make extravagent romantic gestures. You live to serve them. Sure, you argue every now and then, but who doesn’t? You sit down with them, and try to address the problems calmly and rationally. You make plans for the future. You sort everything out for them.

And they, in turn, do nothing. They refuse to listen, they take no responsibility. They shrug and ignore you and all you’ve done. They make no effort themselves. You’ve seen this in a thousand Agony Aunt pages, and the advice is always the same. You can only do so much to help a person, before you have to cut your losses and live your life.

So, why persist with this labour of love? Stubborn pride, perhaps? A sign of weakness to walk away from it? “I couldn’t hack it, so I quit.” There’s a real stigma attached to it. But taking emotion aside from it, look objectively.

You’re in a relationship with this book (please feel free to substitute the word project, person, job, etc), and you’re the only one doing anything to make it work. It’s affecting your thoughts, your emotions, possibly even your health. What you used to enjoy, what you used to love is causing you pain and suffering. Is that right?
Are you getting anything in return? Chances are, no. I have scowled and cursed at the screen before. Something I once felt so good about, and I grew to dread it. Dread looking at that page, and trying, trying to find the right words.

The advantage with a book is that you can turn away from it. It might be hard, but you can step away from it, put it on the shelf, and possibly return to it at a much later date. In the meantime, you can turn to other subjects, and find something a little more fun and rewarding to put your efforts into (still writing, though!)
(And to step back to the relationship analogy, that’s a bit different. There comes a make or break point, where the only thing that can get things back on track is for the other person to change their ways and make a huge effort to make things work again. If only books could do the same thing!)

Why this subject? Because I’ve got that problem with a book. Something which I really want to write. A subject I’m passionate about, and want to put on paper everything that’s in my head. But the damned thing doesn’t want to flow! I’ve worked and worked on it, tried to get it to life, tried to bring out its potential. I’ve changed my vision for it, compromised on parts for it, sacrificed for it, done it all. And it just sits there, sullenly ignoring me.

So, I’m going to leave it for a while. I’ve done all I can with my tenacious spirit for the while. I’m going to let it rest, and fight against it no more. Instead, I shall head for a nice sunny break, clear my head, rest and relax, and look for something a little more fun instead. A little more rewarding.

Like a cocktail. Cheers!

 

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under writing

Book Review – Allah’s Revenge, by Pete Barber

Here we go with the last review for a week or so, as I’m off to sunnier shores. There to bask in sunshine, by the seaside (by the sea), with cocktails in hand and dusky maidens to eye. Anyway. Where was I?

Allah’s Revenge, by Pete Barber – available now through Amazon. Follow the review for the links at the bottom.

Synopsis - New technology is ever a double-edged sword, ready to help the world or threaten it. So it is here, as the terrorist group Allah’s Revenge sieze nanotechnology, designed to devour raw material and convert it into cheap fuel. In their hands, it’s an airborn threat, invisible, silent, deadly. Easily hidden, easily dispersed. And should they choose to make it so, unstoppable…

OK. I have to say this first. I want to dislike this book. I really want to dislike it. And why? Because of the opening scene. A terrorist attack on the London underground. It’s not that I find it in bad taste (taking aside the infamous 7/7 bombings). It’s more that using the Tube every day, there’s a couple of flaws in the execution and the description of the attack methodology. So that set it off on a bad foot for me.

Then, it moves into the old Muslim terrorists, mission from Allah territory. Again, I want to dislike this book.

It’s therefore pleasantly surprising and gratifying to realise that actually, I don’t dislike it. I actually enjoyed it. It’s a well thought out, well written, well paced book. The characters are credible and likeable. The love story is well handled. The multiple threats are (in a nice change) given solid and logical backstories, providing an interesting insight into their motivation and behaviours. The McGuffin (Nanotechnology) is plausible as both a benefit and a threat. Dialogue never rings false. The action scenes (particularly the finale) are handled very well – thrilling and with a genuine sense of threat. The technology is described well enough to hook the layman, but without bogging us down in too much science.

The characters themselves are wonderfully written, identifiable and easy to empathise with. Quinn may, I suspect, evolve into one of those literary detectives that survives book after book. And good for him – he deserves it.

Barber’s great skill here seems to be that he makes it all look easy. He avoids the cliches which would have been so easy, counterbalancing, for example, the evil Muslim terrorists, with human Muslims (their families, their likes, their dislikes, their relationships, their connection with Allah, etc).

The research, the cultural respect, the intelligence, the threat. All well handled. Staggering that this is Barber’s only book on Amazon. He has produced a book that sucks the reader in (barring the Tube incident) and keeps them hooked. An ideal Summer read, and one I would recommend. Thoroughly enjoyable. (Not sure about the cover image, though). 

Allah’s Revenge is available at:

Amazon UK: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Allahs-Revenge-ebook/dp/B0084HM8GU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1343808645&sr=8-1

Amazon US: http://www.amazon.com/Allahs-Revenge-ebook/dp/B0084HM8GU/ref=cm_cr_pr_pb_t

Synopsis: A religious rite dating back to the seventh century inspires a young Muslim scientist and lights the fuse on a fast-paced, thrill-ride of a novel populated by larger-than-life characters, cutting edge technology, a hero you can root for, and villains you will love to hate. . .
An Arab genius creates a nanotechnology weapon capable of destroying the human race and yet small enough to conceal on a hint of perfume. Recruited by Allah’s Revenge, a Palestinian terrorist organization, he triggers worldwide panic when his weapon suffocates the passengers on a crowded London train in ninety seconds, filling their lungs with hard, black charcoal.
Quinn, an English detective, is first on the scene. A British journalist has a link to the terrorists, and Quinn uses him as bait to flush them out.
When their demands are not met, Allah’s Revenge wipes out the world leaders attending the G20 summit in South Korea, including the US Vice President.
Quinn tracks the terrorists to their lair in Jerusalem and seems to have the weapon under control, but it is unleashed again in Phoenix, Arizona, and Quinn needs all his wits and courage to prevent a horde of nanobots from decimating America.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Book Reviews